1
If we want to make society as suitable for life as possible, its structure should not contradict the following:
1. everyone sees the world in their own way + no one knows the truth;
2. it is not beneficial for a person to violate other people’s boundaries.
In other words, no opinion should be imposed in any form:
- physical: fights, robberies, murders, etc.;
- indirect: playing music through a speaker on the street, littering, etc.;
- verbal: claiming that “this is the truth,” “I know better,” “you are like this ...,” “the world works differently,” “our product is the best,” “top 5 ...,” “person of the year,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.
That means society rejects such categories as truth and objectivity; judgments outside personal opinion; self-esteem; guilt; morality; discipline; manipulation; child upbringing where adults teach a child what something is and what it is like; and others.
In such a society, when a person wants to say something, they speak from the position of personal opinion – how they perceive something, not what it is by its “essence.”
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
Also, there should not be a single law aimed at personal benefit rather than at reaching even greater equality among all people. Otherwise, this will lead to self-sabotage at the level of society. Because excessive restrictions affect all participants of the system in one way or another, limiting their ability to realize their processes and thereby making their lives more difficult. As a result, this lowers the possible peak effectiveness of society as a whole – the quality of life.
In my view, the implementation of the principle of personal reality:
1. Will provide order in society much higher than the current level. Because if people are taught from an early age why it is not beneficial for them to violate other people’s boundaries, then any form of aggression will be perceived as an action without meaning.
2. Is the most effective, simple, and also free solution that will allow the psychological pain of all society to be reduced to a minimum. Because people will have the right to their own life, instead of perceiving what is happening and themselves through categories and beliefs imposed by someone else.
3. The quality of products and services will grow, because people will no longer be able to get traffic and sales through destructive triggers.
4. There will be no self-sabotage in people’s lives. Because if no one interfered with a person’s perception, then they will have no way to act against themselves. That is, if no one convinced you that there is “bad or good,” “right and wrong,” etc., then you have no fear of a “mistake” / not being good enough / etc.
Doesn’t this make the principle itself “the truth”?
No, these are the conditions we are born with, just like the need to eat and drink. We can ignore these inputs, but in that case life will be a less pleasant experience.
1. everyone sees the world in their own way + no one knows the truth;
2. it is not beneficial for a person to violate other people’s boundaries.
In other words, no opinion should be imposed in any form:
- physical: fights, robberies, murders, etc.;
- indirect: playing music through a speaker on the street, littering, etc.;
- verbal: claiming that “this is the truth,” “I know better,” “you are like this ...,” “the world works differently,” “our product is the best,” “top 5 ...,” “person of the year,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.
That means society rejects such categories as truth and objectivity; judgments outside personal opinion; self-esteem; guilt; morality; discipline; manipulation; child upbringing where adults teach a child what something is and what it is like; and others.
In such a society, when a person wants to say something, they speak from the position of personal opinion – how they perceive something, not what it is by its “essence.”
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
Also, there should not be a single law aimed at personal benefit rather than at reaching even greater equality among all people. Otherwise, this will lead to self-sabotage at the level of society. Because excessive restrictions affect all participants of the system in one way or another, limiting their ability to realize their processes and thereby making their lives more difficult. As a result, this lowers the possible peak effectiveness of society as a whole – the quality of life.
In my view, the implementation of the principle of personal reality:
1. Will provide order in society much higher than the current level. Because if people are taught from an early age why it is not beneficial for them to violate other people’s boundaries, then any form of aggression will be perceived as an action without meaning.
2. Is the most effective, simple, and also free solution that will allow the psychological pain of all society to be reduced to a minimum. Because people will have the right to their own life, instead of perceiving what is happening and themselves through categories and beliefs imposed by someone else.
3. The quality of products and services will grow, because people will no longer be able to get traffic and sales through destructive triggers.
4. There will be no self-sabotage in people’s lives. Because if no one interfered with a person’s perception, then they will have no way to act against themselves. That is, if no one convinced you that there is “bad or good,” “right and wrong,” etc., then you have no fear of a “mistake” / not being good enough / etc.
Doesn’t this make the principle itself “the truth”?
No, these are the conditions we are born with, just like the need to eat and drink. We can ignore these inputs, but in that case life will be a less pleasant experience.