1
If we want to make society as suitable for life as possible, its structure should not contradict the following:
1. everyone sees the world in their own way + no one knows the truth;
2. it is not beneficial for a person to violate other people’s boundaries.
In other words, no opinion should be imposed in any form:
- physical: fights, robberies, murders, etc.;
- indirect: playing music through a speaker on the street, littering, etc.;
- verbal: claiming that “this is the truth,” “I know better,” “you are like this ...,” “the world works differently,” “our product is the best,” “top 5 ...,” “person of the year,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.
That means society rejects such categories as truth and objectivity; judgments outside personal opinion; self-esteem; guilt; morality; discipline; manipulation; child upbringing where adults teach a child what something is and what it is like; and others.
In such a society, when a person wants to say something, they speak from the position of personal opinion – how they perceive something, not what it is by its “essence.”
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
Also, there should not be a single law aimed at personal benefit rather than at reaching even greater equality among all people. Otherwise, this will lead to self-sabotage at the level of society. Because excessive restrictions affect all participants of the system in one way or another, limiting their ability to realize their processes and thereby making their lives more difficult. As a result, this lowers the possible peak effectiveness of society as a whole – the quality of life.
In my view, the implementation of the principle of personal reality:
1. Will provide order in society much higher than the current level. Because if people are taught from an early age why it is not beneficial for them to violate other people’s boundaries, then any form of aggression will be perceived as an action without meaning.
2. Is the most effective, simple, and also free solution that will allow the psychological pain of all society to be reduced to a minimum. Because people will have the right to their own life, instead of perceiving what is happening and themselves through categories and beliefs imposed by someone else.
3. The quality of products and services will grow, because people will no longer be able to get traffic and sales through destructive triggers.
4. There will be no self-sabotage in people’s lives. Because if no one interfered with a person’s perception, then they will have no way to act against themselves. That is, if no one convinced you that there is “bad or good,” “right and wrong,” etc., then you have no fear of a “mistake” / not being good enough / etc.
Doesn’t this make the principle itself “the truth”?
No, these are the conditions we are born with, just like the need to eat and drink. We can ignore these inputs, but in that case life will be a less pleasant experience.
1. everyone sees the world in their own way + no one knows the truth;
2. it is not beneficial for a person to violate other people’s boundaries.
In other words, no opinion should be imposed in any form:
- physical: fights, robberies, murders, etc.;
- indirect: playing music through a speaker on the street, littering, etc.;
- verbal: claiming that “this is the truth,” “I know better,” “you are like this ...,” “the world works differently,” “our product is the best,” “top 5 ...,” “person of the year,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.
That means society rejects such categories as truth and objectivity; judgments outside personal opinion; self-esteem; guilt; morality; discipline; manipulation; child upbringing where adults teach a child what something is and what it is like; and others.
In such a society, when a person wants to say something, they speak from the position of personal opinion – how they perceive something, not what it is by its “essence.”
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
Also, there should not be a single law aimed at personal benefit rather than at reaching even greater equality among all people. Otherwise, this will lead to self-sabotage at the level of society. Because excessive restrictions affect all participants of the system in one way or another, limiting their ability to realize their processes and thereby making their lives more difficult. As a result, this lowers the possible peak effectiveness of society as a whole – the quality of life.
In my view, the implementation of the principle of personal reality:
1. Will provide order in society much higher than the current level. Because if people are taught from an early age why it is not beneficial for them to violate other people’s boundaries, then any form of aggression will be perceived as an action without meaning.
2. Is the most effective, simple, and also free solution that will allow the psychological pain of all society to be reduced to a minimum. Because people will have the right to their own life, instead of perceiving what is happening and themselves through categories and beliefs imposed by someone else.
3. The quality of products and services will grow, because people will no longer be able to get traffic and sales through destructive triggers.
4. There will be no self-sabotage in people’s lives. Because if no one interfered with a person’s perception, then they will have no way to act against themselves. That is, if no one convinced you that there is “bad or good,” “right and wrong,” etc., then you have no fear of a “mistake” / not being good enough / etc.
Doesn’t this make the principle itself “the truth”?
No, these are the conditions we are born with, just like the need to eat and drink. We can ignore these inputs, but in that case life will be a less pleasant experience.
1
1. Explain to people why this is primarily beneficial to them.
2. Keep repeating the principle as a norm of relationships between people, for example through mass advertising, the education system, etc.
3. Require all social media platforms, educational institutions, businesses, course creators, etc. to integrate disclaimers into their structures:
- an intro on the first page of a book, as well as stamping all published books;
- on social media, each post includes a note that it reflects the author’s personal opinion (similar to how AI labels are shown);
- in messengers, a similar label appears in each chat, for example under the text input field;
- in browsers and on all advertising platforms, there is a disclaimer line that cannot be hidden;
- in school, university, etc. classrooms, build a similar information line into or above the board or screen;
- create a list of banned words and phrases in content and advertising (“best,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.).
4. Set corresponding rules for relationships between:
- parents and children;
- teachers and children;
- employers, managers and employees;
- etc.
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
2. Keep repeating the principle as a norm of relationships between people, for example through mass advertising, the education system, etc.
3. Require all social media platforms, educational institutions, businesses, course creators, etc. to integrate disclaimers into their structures:
- an intro on the first page of a book, as well as stamping all published books;
- on social media, each post includes a note that it reflects the author’s personal opinion (similar to how AI labels are shown);
- in messengers, a similar label appears in each chat, for example under the text input field;
- in browsers and on all advertising platforms, there is a disclaimer line that cannot be hidden;
- in school, university, etc. classrooms, build a similar information line into or above the board or screen;
- create a list of banned words and phrases in content and advertising (“best,” “this will definitely help you,” etc.).
4. Set corresponding rules for relationships between:
- parents and children;
- teachers and children;
- employers, managers and employees;
- etc.
*In personal communication, whether to use the verbal form of the principle remains a personal choice, except when communicating with children.
1
1. Don’t present your own or anyone else’s opinion as fact. Instead of saying “this is how it’s,” say “I see it as ...,” “in my view, it’s ...,” etc.
2. Treat the child as an equal in every way, not as someone beneath you. No matter how old they are, the main person in their life is them, not someone else (exceptions: points 5–6). Therefore, there is no punishment, condemnation, evaluation outside of personal opinion; guilt, morality, discipline, truth, ideas of right / wrong, mistakes, or fabrications (such as stories about Santa Claus), etc. The child also chooses for themselves whether to be religious or not, and which religion to follow.
3. Explain why the principle of personal reality benefits them and repeat it: only you decide what something is to you and what it means to you. With one condition: your actions must not violate your own boundaries or those of others.
4. Try to give the child as much attention as they need.
5. Keep track of the child’s condition based on general health and safety guidelines. But if they say they are full or that they are hot / cold, etc., listen to them and watch for changes in how they feel.
6. Over time, explain them the basics of routine: how to cook, clean up, take care of their body (hygiene, exercise, health); and also what can kill or injure them (fire, knives, strangers, etc.).
With this kind of upbringing, a person still gets just as much information from society as usual. At the same time, they retain the ability to live their own life instead of seeing the world through imposed categories.
As a result:
- the person has no self-sabotage (they are not afraid of “making a mistake,” being “unaccepted,” etc.);
- they understand themselves as well as possible = make the most beneficial choices;
- they respect their own boundaries and those of others (they don’t judge others, don’t waste time and energy imposing their views, etc.);
- etc.
2. Treat the child as an equal in every way, not as someone beneath you. No matter how old they are, the main person in their life is them, not someone else (exceptions: points 5–6). Therefore, there is no punishment, condemnation, evaluation outside of personal opinion; guilt, morality, discipline, truth, ideas of right / wrong, mistakes, or fabrications (such as stories about Santa Claus), etc. The child also chooses for themselves whether to be religious or not, and which religion to follow.
3. Explain why the principle of personal reality benefits them and repeat it: only you decide what something is to you and what it means to you. With one condition: your actions must not violate your own boundaries or those of others.
4. Try to give the child as much attention as they need.
5. Keep track of the child’s condition based on general health and safety guidelines. But if they say they are full or that they are hot / cold, etc., listen to them and watch for changes in how they feel.
6. Over time, explain them the basics of routine: how to cook, clean up, take care of their body (hygiene, exercise, health); and also what can kill or injure them (fire, knives, strangers, etc.).
With this kind of upbringing, a person still gets just as much information from society as usual. At the same time, they retain the ability to live their own life instead of seeing the world through imposed categories.
As a result:
- the person has no self-sabotage (they are not afraid of “making a mistake,” being “unaccepted,” etc.);
- they understand themselves as well as possible = make the most beneficial choices;
- they respect their own boundaries and those of others (they don’t judge others, don’t waste time and energy imposing their views, etc.);
- etc.